Meine Diplomarbeitsrecherche fördert interessante Theorien zutage. Manch einer wird das zu theoretisch sein, aber ich find’s doch ganz schön, ein bisschen Handwerkszeug des Verstehens zu kriegen:
“Intimacy forms the common center of loving relationships. It refers to those emotions in a relationship that promote closeness and exchange.
Passion manifests itself in the psychological and physiological arousal that may motivate interactions in romantic relationships. Passion and Intimacy may not necessarily covary in a positive manner. For example, it is possible for a couple to be highly passionate but not overly intimate or vice versa.
Finally, commitment consists of both the short-term decision that the couple loves one another as well as the long-term decision to maintain the romantic relationship.”
Aus Lessin et al. (2005), Five Ways of Assessing Relationship Satisfaction über Sternbergs Theorie (a triangular theory of love).
Passion manifests itself in the psychological and physiological arousal that may motivate interactions in romantic relationships. Passion and Intimacy may not necessarily covary in a positive manner. For example, it is possible for a couple to be highly passionate but not overly intimate or vice versa.
Finally, commitment consists of both the short-term decision that the couple loves one another as well as the long-term decision to maintain the romantic relationship.”
Aus Lessin et al. (2005), Five Ways of Assessing Relationship Satisfaction über Sternbergs Theorie (a triangular theory of love).
Da werd ich doch morgen gleich mal den Originaltext von Sternberg kopieren gehen.
Lessin, A.S. et al. (2005), Five Ways of Assessing Relationship Satisfaction. The familiy journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, Vol.13, Nr.4, 491-495.
Sternberg, R.J. (1986), A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.
Sternberg, R.J. (1986), A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.